Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
1.
Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol ; 11: 23333928241247027, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38665222

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is valuable for predicting long-term care (LTC) certification. However, the precise association between KCL scores and the temporal dynamics of LTC need certification remains unclear. This study clarified the characteristic trajectory of KCL scores in individuals certified for LTC need. Methods: The KCL scores spanning from 2011 to 2019 were obtained from 5630 older individuals, including those certified for LTC need in November 2020, in Iiyama City, Nagano, Japan. We analyzed the KCL score trajectories using a linear mixed model, both before and after propensity score matching. Results: Throughout the 9-year observation period, the KCL scores consistently remained higher in the certified group compared to the non-certified group. Notably, a significant score increase occurred within the 3 years preceding LTC certification. Discussion: Our findings highlight the effectiveness of continuous surveillance using the KCL in identifying individuals likely to require LTC within a few years.

2.
BMC Geriatr ; 23(1): 699, 2023 10 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37904120

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Today we experience "Super-aged society", and a drastic increase in the number of older people needing assistance is an urgent matter for everyone from medical and socio-economical standpoints. Locomotive organ dysfunction due to musculoskeletal disorders is one of the main problems in these patients. Although the concepts of frailty and sarcopenia have been proposed for functional decline, pain remains the main and non-negligible complaint in these of such disorders. This prospective cohort study aimed to observe the changes of reduced mobility in patients with locomotive disorders and to determine the risk factors for functional deterioration of those patients using statistical modeling. METHODS: A cohort of older adults with locomotive disorders who were followed up every 6 months for up to 18 months was organized. Pain, physical findings related to the lower extremities, locomotive function in performing daily tasks, and Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale-25 (GLFS-25) score were collected to predict the progress of deterioration. Group-based trajectory analysis was used to identify subgroups of changes of GLFS-25 scores, and multinomial logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate potential predictors of the GLFS-25 trajectories. RESULTS: Overall, 314 participants aged between 65 and 93 years were included. The participants were treated with various combinations of orthopedic conservative treatments on an outpatient basis. The in-group trajectory model analysis revealed a clear differentiation between the four groups. The mild and severe groups generally maintained their GLFD-25 scores, while the moderate group included a fluctuating group and a no change group. This study showed that comorbidity of osteoporosis was related to GLFS-25 score over 18 months. Age was a weak factor to be moderate or severe group, but gender was not. In addition, the number of pain locations, number of weak muscles, one-leg standing time, grip strength and BMI significantly contributed to the change in GLFS-25 score. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes an effective statistical model to monitor locomotive functions and related findings. Pain and comorbid osteoporosis are significant factors that related to functional deterioration of activities. In addition, the study shows a patient group recovers from the progression and their possible contributing factors.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis , Humans , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Prospective Studies , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Models, Statistical , Locomotion/physiology
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(2): e033853, 2020 02 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32034025

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) trajectory, lifestyle and reproductive factors are associated with knee pain risk among middle-aged women. DESIGN: Prospective study of the Japan Nurses' Health Study (JNHS). SETTING: The JNHS investigates the health of female nurses in Japan. Biennial follow-up questionnaires are mailed to the participants. PARTICIPANTS: The 7434 women aged over 40 years who responded to the 10-year self-administered follow-up questionnaire. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported knee pain at the 10-year follow-up was the primary outcome. We analysed BMI (normal or overweight) trajectory data from a baseline survey to the 10-year follow-up survey using group-based trajectory modelling. Exposure measurements were BMI trajectory, BMI at age 18 years, lifestyle variables and reproductive history. RESULTS: BMI trajectories from baseline to the 10-year follow-up were divided into four groups: remained normal, remained overweight, gained weight or lost weight. At the 10-year follow-up, 1281 women (17.2%) reported knee pain. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that compared with the remained normal group, multivariable-adjusted ORs (95% CI) of knee pain were 1.93 (1.60 to 2.33) for the remained overweight group, 1.60 (1.23 to 2.08) for the gained weight group and 1.40 (0.88 to 2.21) for the lost weight group. The attributable risk percent (95% CI) of the remained overweight group was 48.1% (37.3% to 57.0%) compared with the reference group of remained normal. Alcohol intake at baseline was significantly associated with knee pain. CONCLUSIONS: The lost weight group had a lower risk than the remained overweight group and the gained weight group and did not carry statistically significant risks for knee pain. Weight reduction and maintaining a normal BMI in middle age was important for preventing knee pain in women.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/diagnosis , Body Mass Index , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Obesity/complications , Age Factors , Arthralgia/etiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Japan , Middle Aged , Obesity/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies
4.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 20(1): 379, 2019 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421680

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between radiographic measurement in lumbar spine and clinical information including symptoms or results of functional testing using a baseline data of longitudinal cohort study. METHODS: A total of 314 elderly subjects were recruited from 5 orthopedic clinics or affiliated facilities. Data for the present investigation were collected via an interviewer-administered questionnaire, which included questions on past medical history, drug history, pain area. And also results of functional testing and X-ray imaging of the lumbar spine were collected. Analysis was carried out to determine any correlation between results of X-ray imaging of the lumbar spine and other collected data, and sorted regarding Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The correlations among these variables and odds ratio were also analyzed. RESULTS: T12/L1% disc height showed a minimum AIC value with buttock pain (- 4.57) and history of vertebral fracture (- 4.05). The L1/L2, L2/L3, and L3/L4% disc height had a minimal AIC value with knee pain (- 4.11, - 13.3, - 3.15, respectively), and odds ratio of knee pain were 3.5, 3.8, and 2.7, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Correlation was recognized between the T12/L1% disc height and both buttock pain and previous vertebral fractures, and the L1/L2, L2/L3, and L3/L4% disc height showed a correlation with knee pain. Especially the L2/L3% disc height and knee pain had a strong correlation. It was suggested that these findings may provide additional basis to the concept that lumbar spinal lesion associates with knee pain clinically.


Subject(s)
Arthralgia/epidemiology , Intervertebral Disc/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spondylosis/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthralgia/etiology , Arthralgia/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Intervertebral Disc/pathology , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/complications , Spondylosis/pathology
5.
Clin Rheumatol ; 37(9): 2479-2487, 2018 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29713967

ABSTRACT

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is one of the main causes of mobility decline in the elderly. Non-surgical treatments such as administration of supplements to strengthen the joint cartilage matrix have become popular not only for pain relief but also for joint preservation. Glucosamine has been used in many countries based on the increasing evidence of its effectiveness for OA. Although there are many previous studies and systematic reviews, the findings vary and different conclusions have been drawn. We aimed to review recent randomized controlled trials on glucosamine for knee OA to reveal up-to-date findings about this supplement. We also performed a meta-analysis of some of the outcomes to overcome the unsolved bias in each study. Eighteen articles written between 2003 and 2016 were analyzed. Many used visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), which were assessed in our meta-analysis. We found a marginally favorable effect of glucosamine on VAS pain scores. The effect on knee function, as measured by the WOMAC, was small and not significant. A newly established knee OA scale, the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM), is commonly used in Japan. Although the number of subjects was small, the JKOM meta-analysis indicated that glucosamine is superior to a placebo in alleviating knee OA symptoms. Given this, we concluded that glucosamine has the potential to alleviate knee OA pain. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of glucosamine on knee function and joint preservation, as well as to evaluate the combined effect with other components, such as chondroitin.


Subject(s)
Glucosamine/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Arthralgia/drug therapy , Humans , Japan , Knee Joint , Pain Measurement , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
6.
BMC Geriatr ; 17(1): 165, 2017 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28747158

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ageing is associated with a decline of motor function and ability to perform daily activities. Locomotive disorders are one of the major disorders resulting in adverse health condition in elderly people. Concept of Locomotive syndrome (LoS) was proposed to tackle the problems and prolong healthy life expectancy of people with locomotive disorders. To develop intervention strategy for LoS it is mandatory to investigate impairments, functional disabilities which people with locomotive disorder experience and to examine relationships among these parameters. For this purpose we have developed Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale-25 (GLFS-25). Though several physical performance tests were reported for identification or monitoring the severity of LoS, there are few studies reported on characteristics of disability which people with locomotive disorders experience. The aim of this study was to report the characteristics of ADL disabilities in elderly people with locomotive disorders in terms of numbers and degree of activity limitations. METHODS: We organized a cohort study and recruited 314 participants aged 65 years and over from five orthopedic clinics or nursing care facilities. This was a cross-sectional study to use the baseline data of such cohort. ADL disabilities were assessed using GLFS-25 scale arranging the GLFS-25 scores in ordinal levels using "R language" program. Numbers and degrees of activity limitations were determined and compared among the levels. Frequency of limitation in activities regarding social activity, housework, locomotion, mobility and self-care was compared among across the disability level. RESULTS: The GLFS-25 score was mathematically categorized into 7 levels. The number of activity limitations and the degrees of each activity limitation were significantly greater in high GLFS-25 levels than in low levels. Difficulties in mobility appeared in less severe level, difficulties in domestic and social life appeared in moderately severe level, and difficulties in self-care appeared in advanced level. CONCLUSIONS: High GLFS-25 score represented high degree of disability on ADLs. Concordant increase of numbers of activity limitation and severity progression in activity limitation may contribute to progression of disability. Activity limitation may occur in the following order: sports activity, walking, transferring, and self-care.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living , Disability Evaluation , Geriatric Assessment , Locomotion , Mobility Limitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Self Care , Syndrome
7.
Clin Rheumatol ; 36(8): 1839-1847, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28303358

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect of balneotherapy on relieving pain and stiffness and improving physical function, compared to controls, among patients with knee osteoarthritis. We searched electronic databases for eligible studies published from 2004 to December 31, 2016, with language restrictions of English or Japanese. We screened publications in Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, and the Japan Medical Abstracts Society Database using two approaches, MeSH terms and free words. Studies that examined the effect of balneotherapy for treating knee osteoarthritis of a ≥2-week duration were included. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were used as the outcome measure. A total of 102 publications were assessed according to the exclusion criteria of the study; eight clinical trial studies, which comprised a total of 359 cases and 375 controls, were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis analyzed improvement in WOMAC score at the final follow-up visit, which varied from 2 to 12 months post-intervention. Our meta-analysis indicates that balneotherapy was clinically effective in relieving pain and stiffness, and improving function, as assessed by WOMAC score, compared to controls. However, there was high heterogeneity (88 to 93%). It is possible that balneotherapy may reduce pain and stiffness, and improve function, in individuals with knee osteoarthritis, although the quality of current publications contributes to the heterogeneity observed in this meta-analysis.


Subject(s)
Balneology/methods , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Treatment Outcome
8.
J Orthop Sci ; 22(2): 339-344, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28087218

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Locomotive disorders are one of the main causative pathologies for the condition requiring assistance on activities of daily living (ADL). Although psychological concerns such as feeling of depression and anxiety are prevalent in elderly people, the causal relation among motor function, ADL disability, and psychological concerns is controversial. PURPOSE: Purpose of this study was to investigate causal relationship among motor function, ADL disability, and psychological concerns in elderly people with locomotive disorders. METHODS: The data for this study were from a community-dwelling sample of 314 elderly persons with locomotive disorders aged 65 and older who visited orthopedic clinics and/or affiliated institutions. Motor function was assessed by one-leg standing time with eyes open, leg extension power and grip power. We assessed ADL disability using the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25), and psychological concerns by three self-reported questions. We constructed two models and tested fitness of the models to the data using a structural equation modeling (SEM). Model 1: motor function affects ADL disability and ADL disability affects psychological concerns, Model 2: motor function affects psychological concerns and psychological concerns affects ADL disability. RESULTS: The fit indices were chi-square = 23.152 (p = 0.081), RMSEA = 0.042, GFI = 0.981, AGFI = 0.955, CFI = 0.987 for Model 1, and chi-square = 84.583 (p < 0.001), RMSEA = 0.119, GFI = 0.935, AGFI = 0.854, CFI = 0.892 for Model 2. These fit indices indicated a good fit of the model 1 and inadequate fit of model 2 to the data. CONCLUSION: Decline of motor function contributed toward psychological concerns via ADL disability in elderly people with locomotive disorders.


Subject(s)
Activities of Daily Living/psychology , Aging/psychology , Disability Evaluation , Mobility Limitation , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aging/physiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Independent Living , Locomotion/physiology , Male , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Self Report
9.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 35(4): 375-384, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27465912

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of elcatonin injections and oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for patients with osteoporosis who have acute lumbar pain after experiencing new vertebral compression fractures. Two hundred twenty-eight Japanese female patients (mean age 77.3 years) with acute lumbar pain from osteoporotic vertebral fractures were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in one group were given an NSAID (NSAIDs group) and patients in the other group were given weekly intramuscular injections of 20 units of elcatonin (elcatonin group). All patients underwent follow-up examinations up to 6 weeks from the start of the trial. Outcome measures were the level of functional impairment according to the Japan Questionnaire for Osteoporotic Pain (JQ22), the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), and a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain intensity. Statistical analyses focused on (1) the time course of pain and functional level using linear mixed effects models to analyze the longitudinal data and (2) the effectiveness of elcatonin injection with mean difference values and 95 % confidence intervals. Significant differences were seen over time between the initial values and the postintervention values (4 and 6 weeks) in JQ22, RDQ, and VAS scores (effect size d > 0.4) in each group. The mean differences between the elcatonin group and the NSAIDs group in each measure at 4 and 6 weeks were -4.8 and -8.3 for the JQ22, -1.3 and -2.6 for the RDQ, and -11.3 and -11.5 for the VAS, shifted to elcatonin. Once weekly elcatonin injection was more effective than NSAIDs for treating acute lumbar pain and improving mobility in Japanese women with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Back Pain/drug therapy , Calcitonin/analogs & derivatives , Osteoporotic Fractures/drug therapy , Spinal Fractures/drug therapy , Acute Disease , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Calcitonin/adverse effects , Calcitonin/pharmacology , Calcitonin/therapeutic use , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Japan , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Osteoporotic Fractures/complications , Spinal Fractures/complications , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
10.
Qual Life Res ; 26(1): 35-43, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27469504

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Locomotive disorders due to musculoskeletal involvement are one of the main causes requiring long-term care services in aging Japan. "Locomotive syndrome (LoS)" is a concept referring to the condition under which people require assistance from others or at risk in future. The object of this study is to examine the relationship between self-reported measure and physician-judged degrees on ADL disability in elder people with locomotive disorders. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 711 patients who were aged 65 years old or more were recruited from 49 outpatient clinics and hospitals. We investigated ADL disabilities by self-reported questionnaire (Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale-25: GLFS-25) and physician-judged grading (Locomotive Dysfunction Grade: LDG) and examined the relationship between these two. RESULTS: We classified the severity of locomotive disability by clinical phenotype into six grades: LDG Grade 1 (N = 77), Grade 2 (213), Grade 3 (139), Grade 4 (162), Grade 5 (78), and Grade 6 (42). The mean of GLFS-25 was 25.9. The mean of GLFS-25 was 5.68 for Grade 1, 14.33 for Grade 2, 22.34 for Grade 3, 35.40 for Grade 4, 43.25 for Grade 5, and 60.24 for Grade 6. Significant differences of GLFS-25 scores were found between adjacent LDGs. CONCLUSIONS: Physician-judged grade of locomotive dysfunction was significantly related to self-reported assessment scale on ADL disability. Physician-judged dysfunction grade is readily administered scale and useful to assess the severity of locomotive dysfunction. Self-reported scale provides precise information on ADL disabilities due to locomotive organ dysfunction and is useful to develop intervention programs.


Subject(s)
Gait Disorders, Neurologic/rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Physician-Patient Relations , Quality of Life , Self Report , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 237(4): 307-15, 2015 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26616271

ABSTRACT

Stroke patients suffer from gait disturbance due to altered leg muscle actions. Many kinesiological studies have investigated muscle actions, but the metabolic activity of muscles in stroke patients remains to be investigated. We therefore evaluated energy consumption in lower extremity muscles during level walking in hemiparetic individuals. Glucose uptake was measured by positron emission tomography (PET) using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) in eight hemiparetic (mean age: 56 years) and 11 healthy (mean age: 26 years) participants. Standardized uptake ratio (SUR) was computed in each muscle to express the (18)F-FDG-uptake level. SUR was compared across gluteal, thigh, and lower leg muscles and across individual muscles within each muscle group. For each muscle, SUR was compared among the paretic limb of hemiparetic participants, the non-paretic limb of hemiparetic participants, and the right limb of healthy participants. In paretic limbs, mean SUR did not differ between the three muscle groups, or between individual muscles within each muscle group. SURs of paretic lower leg muscles and gluteus minimus muscle were significantly smaller than those of non-paretic limb and healthy participants (p < 0.05). In the non-paretic limb of hemiparetic participants, SUR of the lower leg muscles was larger than that of the thigh muscles (p < 0.05). Unexpectedly, SURs of medial hamstring and posterior tibial muscles were larger in the non-paretic limb of hemiparetic participants, compared to the right limb of healthy participants (p < 0.05). (18)F-FDG PET is useful to evaluate energy consumption levels of lower extremity muscles during level walking in hemiparetic individuals.


Subject(s)
Glucose/metabolism , Leg , Muscle, Skeletal/metabolism , Paresis/metabolism , Walking , Adult , Aged , Energy Metabolism , Female , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18/metabolism , Functional Laterality , Heart Rate , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Muscle, Skeletal/diagnostic imaging , Paresis/diagnostic imaging , Positron-Emission Tomography , Radiopharmaceuticals/metabolism , Stroke/metabolism
12.
J Orthop Sci ; 20(5): 888-95, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26008771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Motor dysfunction is a major reason why the elderly lose their independence in their daily lives. The concept of locomotive syndrome has been proposed to describe the risk of mobility dependence caused by various locomotive organ disorders. The preservation of locomotive organs is now socially important in the middle-aged and geriatric population. Therefore, it is important to establish a screening program to evaluate motor function and related quality of life in a wide range of ages. METHODS: We propose a new set of pre-existing scales (the Two-Step test, Stand-Up test, and 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale) as screening tools to identify the population at high risk for locomotive syndrome. We performed a preliminary survey on 777 subjects who had no apparent disorders related to motor function. We also examined the reliability of the Two-Step test and Stand-Up test. RESULTS: We found that each scale did not show ceiling or floor effects in various age groups. Because the correlations between the three scales were significant but weak, we assume that each scale covers different aspects of mobility. The test-retest reliability was found to be satisfactory for the Two-Step test and the Stand-Up test. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that our "Short Test Battery for Locomotive syndrome" is a feasible and reliable tool for screening the adult population as a preventative strategy for locomotive syndrome in a super-aged society.


Subject(s)
Geriatric Assessment/methods , Locomotion/physiology , Mass Screening/methods , Mobility Limitation , Program Development , Quality of Life , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
13.
J Orthop Sci ; 19(4): 620-6, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24842007

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish the cutoff time for the one-leg standing (OLS) test (with eyes open) to use when screening elderly people for locomotive syndrome. METHODS: Patients visiting orthopedic clinics and healthy volunteers, all ≥65 years old, were recruited. Participants were asked to complete the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25) and then underwent the OLS test. Using the previously determined GLFS-25 cutoff value, participants were divided into two groups: the locomotive and the non-locomotive syndrome groups (GLFS-25 scores of ≥16 and <16, respectively). Conventional receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was used to calculate the optimal cutoff time for the OLS. RESULTS: Data from 880 individuals (261 men, 619 women; mean age (SD), 77 (6) years; range 65-96 years) were analyzed; 497 were in the locomotive syndrome group and 383 were in the non-locomotive syndrome group. A significant difference was seen between each group mean for individual average (IA) OLS times (IA-OLS: the average of the OLS times obtained for both legs of an individual). According to ROC analysis without age adjustment, when the IA-OLS time was ~9 s, the sum of the sensitivity and specificity of the test was highest. However, because of a statistically significant difference in IA-OLS time among the three age groups (aged ≤70, aged >70 and ≤75, and aged >75), we determined the optimal cutoff value for IA-OLS time for each of the three age groups using ROC analysis. According to additional ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff for IA-OLS time was 19 s for individuals aged ≤70, 10 s for individuals aged >70 and ≤75, and 6 s for individuals aged >75 when screening elderly persons for locomotive syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: We propose using a GLFS-25 score of 16 and/or a cutoff for the IA-OLS time of 19 s for individuals aged ≤70, 10 s for individuals aged >70 and ≤75, and 6 s for individuals aged >75 when screening elderly persons to determine who should receive medical intervention or undergoing training programs.


Subject(s)
Disability Evaluation , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Locomotion , Mobility Limitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Leg , Male , Syndrome , Time Factors
14.
J Bone Miner Metab ; 31(6): 663-73, 2013 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23690160

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to record the clinical course of osteoporosis over time in Japanese women. We hypothesized that successful control of acute pain associated with osteoporosis will allow better treatment for health-related problems. To confirm this working hypothesis, we developed the Japan Questionnaire for Osteoporotic Pain (JQ22) to measure health status associated with osteoporosis. We examined the validity and reliability of the JQ22 compared with the current gold standard scale for back pain, the Roland Morris questionnaire (RDQ). A total of 125 women who were more than 65 years old, had an acute back pain episode, and had a fragile vertebral fracture confirmed by X-ray and clinical signs, participated in this study. The psychometric analyses for validity and reliability were tested for the JQ22 and the RDQ. The time course up to 6 weeks was observed by investigating both changes in pain characteristics and its influence on related activities and social participation. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.979 and 0.919 for the JQ22 and RDQ, respectively. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) indicated that the JQ22 items were separated into four domains, which were sequentially arranged at the baseline and subsequently changed. This structure reflected osteoporotic back characteristics covering a range from pain to social activities. The JQ22 was shown to be a valid and reliable scale for patient-based measurement of osteoporotic back pain. It also revealed both changes in pain characteristics and the influence of pain on related activities and participation.


Subject(s)
Back Pain/etiology , Osteoporosis/complications , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Spinal Fractures/complications , Aged , Asian People , Female , Health Status , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Social Participation , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Exp Brain Res ; 218(4): 579-88, 2012 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22418782

ABSTRACT

Congenital insensitivity to pain (CIP), which is an extremely rare sensory neuropathy, is defined as the absence of normal responses to noxious stimuli. Although motor function is not directly impaired in CIP patients, it is likely that the sensory deficit affects the motor control system. In order to characterize motor capacity in CIP patients, we here measured grip force and acceleration of a held object in 12 patients with CIP and 12 age-matched able-bodied subjects. The results demonstrated that the grip force during the object grasp-lift-holding task was significantly greater, less reproducibility and greater fluctuation in the acceleration of the object in CIP patients than in normal subjects. Moreover, some patients showed absence of temporal coupling between the grip and load force, suggesting that anticipatory modulation of the grip force was at least partly impaired. As far as the authors know, this is the first study to characterize motor control ability in patients with CIP. The observed abnormal motor capacity can be at least partly attributed to a lack of sensory inputs mediated by Aδ and unmyelinated C-, specifically C-tactile, fibers. The present results may provide information useful for the prevention of secondary injury and education for patients during the developmental stage.


Subject(s)
Hand Strength/physiology , Motor Skills Disorders/etiology , Pain Insensitivity, Congenital/complications , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Motor Skills Disorders/diagnosis , Time Factors , Young Adult
16.
J Orthop Sci ; 17(2): 163-72, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22222445

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and validity of a new questionnaire, the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale (GLFS-25), for early detection of locomotive syndrome. METHODS: This new screening tool was designed to detect Japanese individuals under high-risk conditions who may soon require care services because of problems of the locomotive organs. Content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, internal-consistency reliability, and reproducibility (test-retest reliability) were examined using psychometric analysis, and a cutoff score to detect locomotive syndrome was determined. To investigate construct validity of the GLFS-25 and determine the cutoff score, the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) were used. RESULTS: Study 1 analyzed 711 Japanese elderly people ≥65 years old. No floor or ceiling effects were included in the GLFS-25. Internal consistency was confirmed by a Cronbach's α reliability coefficient of 0.961. As for the association between the GLFS-25 and European Quality of Life Scale-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), Spearman's correlation coefficient was 0.85 (P < 0.001), showing excellent concurrent validity of the GLFS-25. Categorical principal component analysis showed that the construct structure consisted of one item cluster or the GLFS-25 was unifactorial. The AIC showed that one cluster of seven items was located in the center, with significant associations with the other five clusters. In study 2, 205 individuals were analyzed, and the test-retest interclass correlation was satisfactory (range 0.712-0.924). The cutoff score for identifying locomotive syndrome was set at 16. Validity and reliability of this new measurement were psychometrically confirmed as sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The GLFS-25 offers a valid and reliable questionnaire scale for detecting locomotive syndrome in elderly Japanese individuals.


Subject(s)
Accidental Falls/statistics & numerical data , Geriatric Assessment/methods , Locomotion/physiology , Mass Screening/methods , Mobility Limitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syndrome
17.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 35(17): E811-9, 2010 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20628332

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled trial. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of home-based exercise on pain, dysfunction, and quality of life (QOL) in Japanese individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Exercise therapy is a widely used treatment for CLBP in many countries. The studies on its effectiveness have been performed only in Western industrialized countries. The existence of cross-cultural differences and heterogeneity of patients in each country may influence the outcome of interventions for CLBP. Data that would enable researchers to compare the effectiveness of interventions between widely different societies is lacking. METHODS: A total of 201 patients with nonspecific CLBP were randomly assigned to either the control or exercise therapy group: 89 men and 112 women with a mean age of 42.2 years. The control group was treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and the exercise group performed trunk muscle strengthening and stretching exercises. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity (visual analogue scale) and dysfunction level (Japan Low back pain Evaluation Questionnaire [JLEQ] and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire [RDQ]) over 12 months. The secondary outcome measure was FFD (Finger-floor distance). Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-ranks and Mann-Whitney U tests, and estimation of the median with 95% CI was calculated. RESULTS: In both groups, significant improvement was found at all points of follow-up assessment. However, JLEQ and RDQ were significantly more improved in the exercise group compared to the control group (P = 0.021 in JLEQ, P = 0.023 in RDQ). The 95% CI for the difference of medians of the change ratio between exercise and NSAID groups, [Exercise] - [NSAID], was -0.25 to -0.02 in JLEQ, -0.33 to 0.00 in RDQ, and -0.20 to 0.06 in visual analogue scale. CONCLUSION: The home-based exercise prescribed and monitored by board-certified orthopedic surgeons was more effective than NSAIDs for Japanese patients with CLBP.


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Low Back Pain/therapy , Self Care/methods , Adult , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease/therapy , Female , Humans , Japan , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Statistics, Nonparametric , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
18.
Mod Rheumatol ; 20(1): 24-33, 2010 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19806426

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) plaster for knee osteoarthritis among Japanese patients. An open-labeled, randomized, controlled, multiclinic trial was performed involving outpatient clinic groups. Two comparative groups-plaster NSAIDs and oral NSAIDs-were randomly allocated. The drugs used were limited to the current top three in both groups in Japan. Treatments were assessed after four weeks and compared with the baseline scores. Outcomes were evaluated by two psychometric measures: Japanese knee osteoarthritis measure, and pain with the visual analogue scale. The total number of patients included in the final evaluation was 165 (87 for the plaster group and 78 for the oral group). Between these two groups there were no significant differences in gender, age, body height and weight, body mass index, and X-ray grading. The subjects in both groups showed improvements in both scores at the end of intervention. The differences in the improvements in scores between the two groups were not significant, though the mean rank score and the 95% CI of the plaster group were slightly better than those of the oral group. In conclusion, the local application of a plaster with NSAIDs leads to the same level of improvement in knee osteoarthritis as oral NSAIDs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Bandages , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Pain/prevention & control , Activities of Daily Living , Administration, Oral , Administration, Topical , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoarthritis, Knee/complications , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Outpatients , Pain/etiology , Pain/physiopathology , Pain Measurement , Treatment Outcome
19.
Gait Posture ; 29(2): 208-13, 2009 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18824355

ABSTRACT

In order to examine if the addition of an arch support could improve the biomechanical effect of the laterally wedged insole, three-dimensional gait analysis was performed on 20 healthy volunteers. Kinetic and kinematic parameters at the knee and subtalar joints were compared among the following four types of insoles; a 5-mm thick flat insole, a flat insole with an arch support (AS), a 6 degrees inclined laterally wedged insole (LW), and a laterally wedged insole with an arch support (LWAS). The knee adduction moment averaged for the entire stance phase was reduced by the use of LW and LWAS by 7.7% and 13.3%, respectively, from that with FLAT. The difference in knee adduction moment between LW and LWAS was most obvious in the late stance, which was ascribed to the difference in the progression angle between those insoles. The analyses also revealed that LW tended to increase step width, and that such an increase was completely eliminated by the addition of an arch support to LW. This reduction of step width could be another mechanism for the further reduction of the moment with LWAS. The analyses of biomechanical parameters at the subtalar joints suggested that LWAS allowed the subject to walk in a more natural manner, while exerting greater biomechanical effects than LW. Thus, the addition of an arch support to the laterally wedged insole reduced knee adduction moment more efficiently, possibly through the elimination of potential negative effects of the laterally wedged insole.


Subject(s)
Gait , Knee Joint/physiopathology , Osteoarthritis, Knee/physiopathology , Shoes , Subtalar Joint/physiopathology , Adult , Biomechanical Phenomena , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Orthotic Devices , Walking/physiology
20.
Am J Phys Med Rehabil ; 87(4): 258-69, 2008 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18356618

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect of home-based exercise on knee osteoarthritis among Japanese in comparison with that of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). DESIGN: An open-labeled, randomized, controlled, multiclinic trial compared home-based quadriceps exercise with NSAIDs. Treatments were basically evaluated after 8 wks and compared with the baseline scores. Outcomes were evaluated with a set of psychometric measurements including the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure (JKOM), and pain with the visual analog scale. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients entered this trial to provide the baseline data. After 21 cases withdrew, the final number analyzed was 121 cases: 63 for the exercise group and 58 for the NSAIDs group. Between these two groups, there was no significant difference in gender, age, body height and weight, body mass index, or each score at baseline. The subjects in both groups showed improvements in all scores at the end of intervention. The difference in improvement rate of each score between the two groups was not statistically significant, though the mean rank score measured with JKOM in the exercise was slightly better than that of the NSAIDs. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based exercise using quadriceps strengthening improves knee osteoarthritis no less than NSAIDs.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Exercise Therapy/methods , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Quadriceps Muscle/physiology , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Isotonic Contraction , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Self Administration , Severity of Illness Index
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...